One researcher's perspective, in case this hasn't been discussed already:
Well, there it is. Biogen and Eisai have announced just this morning that they’re halting Phase III trials of aducanumab, their anti-amyloid antibody, after the monitoring committee judged that further treatment would be futile...... <read more>
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/a ... alzheimers
halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
I certainly want to hear more. Aducanumab removed amyloid below the level of PET scan detectability! At the same time, however, memory decline was only slowed and not reversed. We will never know what a "lifestyle" component to the study would have provided.
Theracurmin (curcumin) is the only other approach the I know of that has removed amyloid plaque (Dr. Gary Small, UCLA). This year we will probably get results from Sally Frautschy's trial at UCLA and the West LA VA Center with Longvida brand of a curcumin product.
Theracurmin (curcumin) is the only other approach the I know of that has removed amyloid plaque (Dr. Gary Small, UCLA). This year we will probably get results from Sally Frautschy's trial at UCLA and the West LA VA Center with Longvida brand of a curcumin product.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:20 pm
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
Are most people taking a Longvida form of curcumin? What about Thorne's Meriva form?
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
The Biogen statement includes: "The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of monthly doses of aducanumab as compared with placebo in slowing cognitive and functional impairment as measured by changes in the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score. Secondary objectives were to assess the effect of monthly doses of aducanumab as compared to placebo on clinical progression as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog 13), and AD Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL-MCI)."cflegal wrote:I certainly want to hear more. Aducanumab removed amyloid below the level of PET scan detectability! At the same time, however, memory decline was only slowed and not reversed. We will never know what a "lifestyle" component to the study would have provided.
Theracurmin (curcumin) is the only other approach the I know of that has removed amyloid plaque (Dr. Gary Small, UCLA). This year we will probably get results from Sally Frautschy's trial at UCLA and the West LA VA Center with Longvida brand of a curcumin product.
- floramaria
- Support Team
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2017 11:22 am
- Location: Northern New Mexico
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
Hi tinamalone,tinamalone wrote:Are most people taking a Longvida form of curcumin? What about Thorne's Meriva form?
What I have in my own cupboard right now is Thorne Meriva. Some people on the forums are using Theracurmin, others Longvida. I just did a quick look at some of the results of a Search for Longvida, and also Theracurmin. If you want to see all the posts related to various forms of curcumin, the Search function will get you there. You can access that either by clicking on the the three stacked dots to the right of your name or clicking on the magnifying glass.
To give you a taste of what you can find with that search, here are links that addresses various forms.
https://alzheimer.neurology.ucla.edu/Curcumin.html
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5828&p=64167&hilit=meriva#p64167
Functional Medicine Certified Health Coach
IFM/ Bredesen Training in Reversing Cognitive Decline (March 2017)
ReCODE 2.0 Health Coach with Apollo Health
IFM/ Bredesen Training in Reversing Cognitive Decline (March 2017)
ReCODE 2.0 Health Coach with Apollo Health
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
ALZFORUM has several technical comments on this report: https://www.alzforum.org/news/research- ... ment-31011
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
So, Biogen is asking the FDA to approve aducanumab, based on a new data analysis.
https://www.statnews.com/2019/10/22/bio ... ducanumab/By June, as Biogen analyzed the full data set, researchers started to realize that a different picture was emerging of aducanumab, Sandrock said. The reason was because of changes that Biogen had made to the study late in the game. Initially, the company worried about a potential side effect — brain swelling — and limited the dosage of the drug. But later patients were allowed to receive higher doses of the medicine.
“In retrospect, the results of the futility analysis was incorrect,” Sandrock said. “That’s because it was from a smaller dataset that looked at patients with less exposure to high dose aducanumab.”
In essence, Sandrock said, the futility analysis had happened too soon. It had looked at data based on last December. But the trials were actually stopped in March. Biogen had run two studies. One, was positive in its own right for the high dose. A second still failed, but shows signs of benefit in those patients who received the higher dose of aducanumab.
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
I'd love to see the primary evidence and compare the before and after CDR-SB scores. Has anybody seen it?Biogen said that the new data show aducanumab is “pharmacologically and clinically active” and that it reduced patients clinical decline based on the results of a survey called Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), which was the study’s main goal.
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
It reduces the rate of decline by about 25% in the high dose group
In EMERGE, which met its pre-specified primary endpoint in the new analysis, patients treated with high dose aducanumab showed a significant reduction of clinical decline from baseline in CDR-SB scores at 78 weeks (23% versus placebo, P=0.01). In EMERGE, patients treated with high dose aducanumab also showed a consistent reduction of clinical decline as measured by the pre-specified secondary endpoints: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 15% versus placebo, P=0.06), the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 13 Items (ADAS-Cog 13; 27% versus placebo, P=0.01), and the AD Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory Mild Cognitive Impairment Version (ADCS-ADL-MCI; 40% versus placebo, P=0.001). Imaging of amyloid plaque deposition in EMERGE demonstrated that amyloid plaque burden was reduced with low and high dose aducanumab compared to placebo at 26 and 78 weeks (P<0.001). Additional biomarker data of tau levels in the cerebrospinal fluid supported these clinical findings. Biogen believes that data from patients in ENGAGE who achieved sufficient exposure to high dose aducanumab supported the findings of EMERGE.
In EMERGE, which met its pre-specified primary endpoint in the new analysis, patients treated with high dose aducanumab showed a significant reduction of clinical decline from baseline in CDR-SB scores at 78 weeks (23% versus placebo, P=0.01). In EMERGE, patients treated with high dose aducanumab also showed a consistent reduction of clinical decline as measured by the pre-specified secondary endpoints: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 15% versus placebo, P=0.06), the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 13 Items (ADAS-Cog 13; 27% versus placebo, P=0.01), and the AD Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory Mild Cognitive Impairment Version (ADCS-ADL-MCI; 40% versus placebo, P=0.001). Imaging of amyloid plaque deposition in EMERGE demonstrated that amyloid plaque burden was reduced with low and high dose aducanumab compared to placebo at 26 and 78 weeks (P<0.001). Additional biomarker data of tau levels in the cerebrospinal fluid supported these clinical findings. Biogen believes that data from patients in ENGAGE who achieved sufficient exposure to high dose aducanumab supported the findings of EMERGE.
Re: halting Phase III trials of aducanumab
Susan,SusanJ wrote:So, Biogen is asking the FDA to approve aducanumab, based on a new data analysis.
Thanks for posting this highly encouraging news about two related studies, each with two-thirds (2/3) of the participants being APOE4 carriers!
Just as a quick re-cap:
https://www.creativebiolabs.net/aducanumab-overview.htm [emphasis added]Aducanumab...is a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody...derived from...cells collected from healthy elderly subjects with no signs of cognitive impairment, and cognitively impaired elderly subjects with unusually slow cognitive decline...
In patients with prodromal or mild AD, one year of monthly intravenous infusions of aducanumab reduces brain Aβ [amyloid beta] in a dose- and time-dependent manner
Here we go: from the Biogen website: https://investors.biogen.com/static-fil ... ccb1d64b65 Lots of data and explanations of decision-making. These statistics jumped out at me: 46% LESS DECLINE on a test of daily living skills for people with MCI taking the high dose, 23% less decline on the CDR.Julie G wrote: I'd love to see the primary evidence and compare the before and after CDR-SB scores. Has anybody seen it?
They also note that it will be early 2020 before they file the application to the FDA.
Just ask the Washington Nationals about being counted out too early.
4/4 and still an optimist!