Clearly the NIA is remiss in not having one of us on their committee!
Seems tau may be a better marker and cognitive outcomes shouldn't be left out. But is the system were sensible I tend to be in favor of calling it 'pre-clinical Alzheimer's' if not 'Alzheimer's'. If someone has asymptomatic cancer or heart disease it's still called what it is. Anything to create wakeup calls/calls to action as long as it's an accurate label. I don't have a problem with 'pre-clinical Alzheimer's', but then it should be pre-clinical heart disease or cancer and that makes no sense because it downplays the urgency.
ApoE 3/4 > Thanks in advance for any responses made to my posts.